Lawyers in Subaru Consumer Protection Lawsuit Denied Co-Lead Class Counsel Status

During these unprecedented times, Clark, Perdue, & List Co, LPA is here to fully support your needs in a timely and safe manner. COVID-19 should not affect your ability to investigate a personal injury case. We currently remain open and are still accepting new cases. With your safety top of mind, we are scheduling all meetings via telephone or video conference at this time.

Less than two weeks ago, a federal judge in New Jersey denied appointment of interim co-lead class counsel status to lawyers representing several Subaru owners in a lawsuit alleging excess oil consumption. The plaintiffs in the lawsuit reside in several states, including California, Florida, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania.

In its order, the Court noted that the Plaintiffs generally allege that Defendants’ vehicles have allegedly defective engines “that burn a substantial portion of their engine oil, leading to increased emissions, decreased fuel efficiency, and potentially significant damage to the engine, catalytic converter, and other components . . .”

According to the order, Defendant Subaru did not oppose the motion on substantive grounds, but instead asserted that “the motion appears to be premature.” In a six page decision and order, the Court agreed with Subaru’s argument and denied appointment of interim class counsel, finding it to be unnecessary at the time.